Which statement reflects the organization’s history with task forces?

• A. Task forces have been effective and encouraging.
• B. Task forces have been counterproductive.
• C. Task forces are never used.
• D. Task forces create confusion.

Answer: (A)

Understanding how task forces have worked within the organization helps explain why this statement is the best description of its history. A task force is a temporary, focused group brought together to tackle a specific issue with cross-functional input. When the history shows that these groups have been effective and encouraging, it means they’ve produced tangible results, engaged relevant stakeholders, and moved initiatives forward without derailing normal operations. That positive track record makes the statement about task forces being effective and encouraging the most accurate reflection of how the organization has used them.

The other possibilities imply outcomes that aren’t supported by the historical pattern described—either that task forces hinder progress, are never used, or cause confusion. If the organization consistently relied on task forces to unlock progress and demonstrated constructive results, those negative or absolute descriptions wouldn’t fit.