Which initiative is highlighted as making progress on decarbonization and should be continued?

• A. Center of Excellence for Building Decarbonization (CEBD)
• B. A new marketing campaign
• C. A restructuring of committees
• D. Removing decarbonization from agenda

Answer: (A)

Progress in decarbonization comes from a focused, ongoing program that coordinates expertise, resources, and measurement. The Center of Excellence for Building Decarbonization embodies that approach by concentrating efforts on decarbonization across projects, developing best practices, and sharing knowledge, which creates tangible momentum and trackable results. Because it is designed to operate over time with milestones and impact, it’s the one most worth continuing. The other options lack that combination of focus, measurable progress, and continuity: a marketing push may raise visibility but doesn’t guarantee decarbonization outcomes; restructuring committees can affect governance but doesn’t ensure progress on decarbonization; removing decarbonization from the agenda would halt progress altogether.